Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr. Suthisak Lohsawat and a juristic person whose major shareholders
subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/2, as well as civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); (2) Mrs. Teo Lee Ngo
Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on them in the amounts of 36,815,524.26 baht, 500,000
#% (.* % !$ +,# !#-!'" 0 1 : # !#-!' 3(.% ' # (haircuts) " 1 .. 54 19 0 2 : ' # K +30. ' # 3 +3- $ ' #E++) (position risk) ' #E&'#II (counterparty risk) 3' #E3E" (large exposure risk) J0(.* #0% "30 (#' 3) 4
, government agencies, and large private companies to deceive people into investing, causing significant financial losses. The press conference took place at the Royal Thai Police, on 23 August 2023.
market?s product variety while it will be more convenient for investors to invest in foreign securities.Foreign securities underlying DRs must either be shares of a large company or investment units of an
evidenced by large amount of related transactions. She then admitted that she took the client's trading orders via mobile phone.The aforesaid actions are in violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of
that such redemption may cause liquidity problem to the mutual fund and thus affects other unitholders. For, funds of funds and feeder funds investing in large overseas funds, however, the redemption may
Activities decreased to 22 million Baht was a result of the postponement of projects in Vietnam as well as last year the company had sold a large number of LED lighting luminaires to an Australian Retail Chain
Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2), and subject to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA). Currently, the offense is specified under Section