The Gross Profit margin was 3 percentage points lower at 8% in Q119 up from Q118 at 11% due to higher higher labour costs 1%, higher depreciation 1%, higher salaries expenses 1% . Page 1 of 3 Operating
% 34% IC (Jiaxing, China) 5% 4% 4% 6% 5% HTI (Ohio, USA) 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Gross Profit / Cost of Sales Analysis and Sales and Administration Analysis The Gross Profit margin was 1
% Gross Profit / Cost of Sales Analysis and Sales and Administration Analysis The Gross Profit margin was 5 percentage points lower at 11% in Q118 down from Q117 at 16% due to stronger THB/USD exchange rate
year were as highlighted below; (Unit : Million Baht) Separate financial statements Q2/2018 Q2/2017 % Change Sales 469 521 (10) Gross Profit Margin 379 396 (4) Selling and Administrative Expenses 54 51 6
. Financial ratio highlight as follow Q3/2018 Q3/2017 YEAR2016 Gross profit margin (%) 33.80 31.00 31.67 EBIT Margin (%) 41.80 39.75 33.64 Net profit margin (%) 36.94 34.28 27.64 Return on equity (%) 10.81 9.77
Profit / Cost of Sales Analysis and Sales and Administration Analysis The Gross Profit margin was 6 percentage points lower at 12% in Q319 down from Q318 at 18% due to reduced economies of scale from lower
margin 95,426 83,001 12,425 14.97% Selling Expenses (24,213) (22,124) 2,089 9.44% Admin Expenses (28,825) (18,495) 10,330 55.85% Finance cost 831 946 (115) (12.16%) Net profit 30,641 28,250 2,391 8.46
% 4% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Gross Profit / Cost of Sales Analysis and Sales and Administration Analysis The Gross Profit margin was 7 percentage points higher at 15% in Q120 up from Q119 at 8% due to
the country aligning to the vision of “World Class Product, World Class Brand”, but also providing higher gross profit margin for domestic energy drink as compared to the traditional energy drink. Sales
increased from Q2-2017 and Q3-2016, representing an increase of 262.6 MB and 457.4 MB, respectively. The changes in total revenue of Q3-2017 and Q2-2016 increased in similar rate as the gross margin of the