committing unlicensed digital asset exchange offense. On March 7, 2024, the Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 3, 26 and 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon and (6) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The
-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the
Director-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on
for the year 2012 (Form 56-1) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On March 26, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56 and Section 274
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307