benefiting himself or others through such misconduct. This is a violation under Section 89/7, with penalties stipulated in Section 281/2, Paragraph 1, of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), and
submission of an incorrect 56-1 One Report for the year 2022 and the disclosure of false information or concealment of material facts that should have been disclosed, in violation of Section 56(3)(4) and
authorities to investigate, which involved checking 10 exhibitors. More evidence were gathered. If any activities liable to be in violation of the laws enforced by the SEC are found, a legal action may be
services liable to be an undertaking of digital asset business in the category of digital asset exchange without license, which is deemed a violation or a failure to comply with Section 26 of the Emergency
within the specified time. The aforementioned activities of {X1} is liable to operating digital asset business in the category of digital asset exchange without license, which is a violation of, or
. ___________________________ Note: The misconduct of the investment consultants, one of whom was also branch manager, is a violation of Clause 23(2), and a prohibited characteristic of capital market personnel under Clause 31
conditions. The three persons? offences were in violation of Section 243(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 244, and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
duty with responsibility and deliberation as a professional. Her misconduct was in violation of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board*. The SEC therefore suspended her approval as
and deliberation as a professional. His misconduct was in violation of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board*. The SEC therefore suspended his approval as securities investment
that he continued to submit trading orders in the same manner. The act of Surin constituted a violation of Section 244/3 and will be subject to punishment under Section 296, Section 296/1, and