? trading values and volumes and lure the general public to trade such shares.The aforesaid actions were deemed manipulation of TYM share price in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243

deemed manipulation of TYM share price in violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code

of their acts, the aforesaid four persons are deemed to possess prohibited characteristics of capital market personnel as specified in the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. Tor

illustrating making trading decision before client acknowledgement. The client then acknowledged the transactions without any objection and made payment completely.  {A}'s actions were deemed using client

client's child, as well as sometimes taking orders via mobile phone.{A}'s actions were deemed as obtaining authorization from client to make securities trading decisions on behalf of client; taking

suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served. _________________ Note:   Clauses 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 re: Approval for Personnel

for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018, the

deemed final. On April 10, 2018, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code regarding SECC shares. The

are Mrs. Darunee Phu-ngoen and Miss Paphawin Pinwatthana. Their actions were therefore deemed in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 307, 308, 311, 313 and 315 of the SEA

misconduct above is deemed an execution of concealed transactions, asset misappropriation, permission of false accounting transactions and preparation of incorrect accounting records. In addition, he informed