reviewed financial statements for Q2/2014 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of Baht 60,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 for each and

specified period. On February 27, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 232,200 and a further fine of Baht 200 each day. Since the accused pled guilty, the

prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official

public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representative failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed

and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 15/01/2015

out. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 05/02/2015

, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 05/02/2015

the inquiry official. Mr. Yuttana’s act violated the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 also. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 19/12/2014

period ended June 30, 2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. A statute of limitations ran out during consideration of inquiry offercial. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

, 308, 311, and 313 of the said Act. This case is under consideration of the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 313 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal