. Thus, he jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section
jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case
long-term returns. Thus, EMM operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions
provided for EMM which committed an offence under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289 by operating securities business without obtaining
for EMM which committed an offence under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289 by operating securities business without obtaining license
allowing the trading account to be used for the YCI transaction in exchange for compensation. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was final. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The inquiry official forwarded the requested for the settlement. The Settlement Committee determined the fine, order no. 93/2017 dated on 15 November2017 and Marnfah Group
Section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The inquiry official forwarded the requested for the settlement. The Settlement Committee determined the fine, order no. 94/2017 dated on 15