into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
orders and payment. The said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee
said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on {A
violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee fined {A} 2,580,211.77 baht, {B} 2,948,813.46 baht and
Exchange Act of 1992 and Section 83 of the Criminal Code. The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a separate fine of 500,000 baht on both.
Exchange Act of 1992 and Section 83 of the Criminal Code. The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a separate fine of 500,000 baht on both.
lawsuit to a civil court SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 241 in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 24/10/2017
therefore filed a criminal complaint with the DSI for further legal proceedings on 14 July 2016. SEC Act S.Section 243 and Section 86 of Criminal Code Settlement Committee Meeting No. 5/2016 Settlement
JAS stock noticeably increased and Mr. Soraj gained undue benefits from selling the JASH16 Futures he had bought. SEC Act S.89/7 and Section 89/10 and Section 89/11 Settlement Committee Meeting No