to mislead the general public to believe that YCI shares were purchased or sold in great volume at that time which was not consistent with the normal market conditions. Additionally, he continuously
Zipmex’s customers that were deposited to earn returns in Thailand in a way that Zipmex, without doubt, could not segregate digital assets of the customers and may use such digital assets for any other
granted as well as signing cheques which were handed to four borrowers. Her abovementioned failure was considered a contravention of Sections 89/7 and 89/24 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E
concerning money withdrawal to mislead others. The aforesaid acts were in contravention of Section 315 of the SEA in conjunction with Sections 307, 308, 311, and 312 of the SEA. SEC Act S.315 Criminal
were in contravention of Section 315 of the SEA in conjunction with Sections 307, 308, 311, and 312 of the SEA. SEC Act S.315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 18/07/2013
others. The aforesaid acts were in contravention of Sections 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the public
others. The aforesaid acts were in contravention of Sections 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 313 in conjunction with
entries were found in the financial statements: year 2008, Q1/2009, Q2/2009, Q3/2009 and year 2009. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.312 Criminal