296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2559 (2016), as amended, (SEA). As aider and abettor, Amornrat and Walailuk violated Section 315 in conjunction with Section 242(1) which

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor

closely coordinating with the DBD, the SEC has considered legal issues under the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) thoroughly to ensure prudence and fairness for all parties. The DBD recently informed the

deemed a failure to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and

and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed

insider trading of COL shares while knowing or possessing inside information were deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with

violation of Section 307, 311, 312(2) in conjunction with 313 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 ("SEA").On June 28, 2011, the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court convicted Suradej Mookayangkul, the

the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. On June 9, 2011, the accused filed an appeal to the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of

. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under