Bangkok, April 8, 2015 ? The Capital Market Supervisory Board approved regulations on payment of bounty to the informer as well as payment of gratuity to the arrestor in cases where fine is imposed

probed into Wiroj case and found that he failed to inform the rules of volatile stock such as stock's risk and settlement duties to the client before submission of purchase order. As a result, the client

and found that he failed to inform the rules of volatile stock such as stock's risk and settlement duties to the client before submission of purchase order. As a result, the client had to settle the

volumes, causing inconsistency with normal market condition. The scheme was aided or abetted by Mr. Prayuth Lertpinyopap, Miss Karuna Kaewmanee, and five other persons who agreed to enter the settlement

volumes, causing inconsistency with normal market condition. The scheme was aided or abetted by Mr. Prayuth Lertpinyopap, and five other persons who agreed to enter the settlement. The public prosecutor

statement for the year 2020 and those financial report within the period specified by the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The inquiry official sent the case back to the Settlement

the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board resulted from the instruction or the failure to give instruction which is duly required to be performed. The inquiry official sent the case back

executed trading orders through the aforesaid trading accounts. {A} had denied all the accusations without adduced counter evidences. Later, she agreed to enter the settlement procedure and made the fine

RICH shares on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in RICH share trading values and volumes, causing inconsistency with normal market condition. In the

seller were deemed as failure to perform duties with honesty and to adhere to the professional ethics and standard of conducts for the capital market personnel. The said actions were in violation of Clause