Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on them in the amounts of 36,815,524.26 baht, 500,000

institution, the securities company may comply with the policy of security of the information technology of such financial institution. [M] · Reviewing and modify updatable by having a risk assessment once a

financial institution, the securities company may comply with the policy of security of the information technology of such financial institution. [M] o Reviewing and modify updatable by having a risk

Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2), and subject to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA). Currently, the offense is specified under Section

Surapol was deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). These individuals are subject to the penalties under

and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. Additionally, the use of other persons’ securities trading accounts to

misconduct in violation of Section 170 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992)  (SEA) was dishonest duty performance that caused damage to the company or created a benefit for himself, as specified

B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). As a result, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the four persons involved, namely (1) Mr. Bhusana Premanode and (2) Ms. Sunjutha Witchawut, former IEC director and

, liable to be offenses pursuant to Section 307, Section 308, Section 311 and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The

) (SEA), as the case may be, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code. Additionally, the act of Natthawat was liable to be an offense under Section 244/3(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 315 of