and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. Additionally, the use of other persons’ securities trading accounts to

misconduct in violation of Section 170 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992)  (SEA) was dishonest duty performance that caused damage to the company or created a benefit for himself, as specified

B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). As a result, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the four persons involved, namely (1) Mr. Bhusana Premanode and (2) Ms. Sunjutha Witchawut, former IEC director and

, liable to be offenses pursuant to Section 307, Section 308, Section 311 and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The

) (SEA), as the case may be, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code. Additionally, the act of Natthawat was liable to be an offense under Section 244/3(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 315 of

offense under Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), subject to the penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).By allowing Dr

understanding and acknowledgement.In any case, failure to comply with the SEC's order above is liable to violation or failure to comply with Section 58(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992)(SEA

Laksana and Sommart in this case is deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code which is subject to

the share price of RASA was in violation of Section 238 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA). He agreed to enter the fining process. The

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a fine on him in the amount of 48,127,389.54 baht. As aider and abettor,  Pathaipoom and Chalalai were deemed to