, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served. For {B}, the SEC suspended her from duty as the approved equity investment consultant for one month, effective from March 16, 2015

made by clients were in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended Napat from his duty as the approved

capital market personnel has been set in lieu of the revocation because her approved capital market investment consultant status has ended since December 31, 2014 without a renewal. The said period is

market personnel has been set in lieu of the revocation because her approved capital market investment consultant status has ended since December 31, 2014 without a renewal. The said period is effective

behalf of clients was in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended {A} from his duty as the approved

Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market.* The SEC therefore suspended him from duty as the approved securities investment consultant for 4 months. Having considered that

Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended {A} from her duty as the approved capital market investment consultant for two months, effective from February 9, 2015

therefore suspended {A} from his duty as the approved securities investment consultant for one month, effective from February 23, 2015.---------------* Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended {A} from his duty as the approved capital market investment consultant for six months. Taking into account that he had

since September 16 and the Capital Market Supervisory Board, on October 18, approved a revision to the fund size rule in support of different types of project and the current business environment. The