Public Co.,Ltd. 396.82 341.99 LH Property and Loan Fund II 12.88 9.04 Quality House Public Co.,Ltd. 211.92 193.84 Total 798.62 752.40 7. The comparison of the Company’s administration expenses of the
. 412.92 357.65 LH Property and Loan Fund II 18.63 16.23 Quality House Public Co.,Ltd. 330.14 281.67 Total 930.09 830.65 6. The comparison of the Company’s administration expenses of the third quarter 2018
from sales and services. In addition, the Company had the increased selling and administration expenses for restaurant and bakery domestic business, which came from the rents of the existing stores and
construction started in 2018 such as Chulalongkorn University, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University and Department of Provincial Administration. Cost of sales and Gross Profit Cost of sales for
-year guidance, underpinned by improved 4G network and larger AIS Fibre coverage. QoQ, revenue slightly dropped by 0.8%. The handset campaigns were more selective, resulting in lower marketing expense
our customers and generate higher income from both the content as well as subscription in mobile and broadband. Revised down full year guidance following the rising economic risk We revised down the
following revenue decline while maintaining FY22 guidance AIS continued to enhance operating efficiency while expanding 5G/4G to strengthen our network leadership, reflected in a muted increase in both cost
% QoQ. FY22 guidance maintained. For 9M22, AIS performance was in-line with the guidance. The revenue expects to grow with the seasonality trend in the fourth quarter. A slight decline in EBITDA (-2.4