deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 244(5), while the action of Satida was deemed a contravention of Section 315 in conjunction with Section 242(1), and the action of

trading orders of Preyatada was assisted or facilitated by Kittika and Thana.  The acts of the individuals above were liable to be offenses under Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244(1) and

(Section 103, 104) |- Auditors |- Reporting |- Fees |- Related Circular Letter    Marketing |- Approval and Standards Practice |- Code of Conduct |- Fees |- Related Circular Letter    Fund Rating Agency

correlated with the trading activities in the account for which Mr. Suthee was authorized to place price-manipulating orders.  The actions of these two individuals constitute offenses under Section 244/3(1) in

orders in a continuous manner with the intent to manipulate the prices or trading volumes of the securities beyond normal market conditions.Patcharadanai’s actions were deemed a contravention of Section

deemed to be an operation of the digital asset exchange business without license pursuant to Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses whereby Bybit has operated without any license and

service.The actions of Bybit are deemed to be an operation of the digital asset exchange business without license pursuant to Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses whereby Bybit has

have been disclosed, in materiality, in the Filing Form, in violation of Section 278 of the SEA. This offense of ETL at the time was a result of orders or omissions of duties of nine persons who were

return to the unitholders after the inside information was disclosed.Chanyarat’s and Eakarat’s acts were liable to be the offenses under Section 241 and subject to the penalties under Section 296 of the

mission to protect the interests of the state. It is vital in undertaking the charges of offenders with fines in criminal cases under Section 29/1 of the Criminal Code, legal execution  in breach of bail