) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of the Criminal Code. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en/Enforce Civil Action Dated 06
opinions to the public prosecutor for consideration of prosecution. This approach follows the check and balance principle within the judicial process. In such proceedings, the SEC can integrate collaboration
criminal complaint filed by the SEC, the criminal enforcement process will proceed with an investigation by the inquiry official, a prosecution of the public prosecutor, and an adjudication of the court of
comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 26 February 2018, the public prosecutor filed a legal action against Surasak and Ekkamon with the Civil Court after the SEC had submitted the case for the Court
December 2018, the public prosecutor filed a lawsuit against Suphanan with the Civil Court in the Black Case No. Por. 7633/2561. On 12 November 2019, the Civil Court dismissed the case in the Red Case No
public prosecutor then filed the case with the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court where only the charge against Kittipat was accepted.The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court today convicted Kittipat for violating
another person. Then, the shares were resold to ZMICO at 19.75 baht per share which was not the normal market price. Later, the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order and filed a lawsuit against