result, the trading of TAPAC shares contradicted normal market conditions. The manipulation of the TAPAC shares by the aforesaid persons is deemed an offense under Section 243(1) in conjunction with

, focuses on the additional objective of the CMDF establishment ? permission for the CMDF to give financial support for the SET as deemed necessary to ensure the bourse's ability to maintain its

refused to cooperate with other IFEC directors to facilitate the board of directors’ meeting by making available a meeting venue. Such misconduct was therefore deemed as the failure to perform his duty

’ instruction and refused to facilitate a meeting venue for the board of directors’ meeting. Such misconduct was therefore deemed as the failure to perform his duties as a listed-company director and executive

applicable to the auditors, it is deemed to be applicable to the listed companies as well. In addition, SEC has issued the practical guidelines for use by the audit committee in consideration of

against them with the DSI for further legal proceedings.During the legal proceedings, {A} and {B} are deemed as having prohibited characteristics of capital market personnel and untrustworthy

misconduct was deemed taking an unfair advantage of other persons in violation of Section 241 and liable to penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act. The Criminal Fining Committee has

to mislead and induce the investing public into the trading. His above acts were deemed share price manipulation in contravention of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and Section 243(2) of the

evening.His action was deemed using inside information to take advantage of the others in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and thus liable to the penalty

Somchai, Chaninun, and Thanakorn were deemed as violation of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). All of them were allowed to enter the settlement procedure. As