the comparison of the performance between the third quarter of 2019 and the third quarter of 2018: 1. COMMERCIAL BANKING BUSINESS LH Financial Group Public Company Limited Management Discussion and
Business, and return on investment in other companies. Therefore, there was no similar type of business in the industry that can be used as a benchmark for comparison. Not include transaction related to the
. Therefore, there was no similar type of business in the industry that can be used as a benchmark for comparison.
was no similar type of business in the industry that can be used as a benchmark for comparison.
year. The quarterly comparison of its performance in different business categories is shown in the table below: (Unit: Million Baht) Third quarter 9-month period 2017 2016 Difference % 2017 2016
performances Comparison is as follows: (Unit : Thousand Baht) Consolidate F/S Q3/2017 Q3/2016 Δ% Q2/2017 Δ% Q1/2017 Δ% Revenues from sales and services 802,230 855,852 -6% 704,817 14% 870,845 -8% Interest income
. Pricing impact on revenue: the company realized overall higher prices in Q4 compared with previous months on same-customer comparison basis given the robust demand and increased input cost pressure on all
comparison. Not include transaction related to the novation of the M&E systems under the concession agreement of the MRT Chalong Ratchadham Line Project which the MRTA is fully responsible for both loan
the industry that can be used as a benchmark for comparison. Not include transaction related to the novation of the M&E systems under the concession agreement of the MRT Chalong Ratchadham Line Project