supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. In addition, ACAP recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition
addition, the acts mentioned above were assisted or facilitated by Winsound (Thailand) and Mr. Thanachart Siriphanukhema. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official SEC Act S
order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger. This case is in the
. Aran’s order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger. This case is
to Mr. Aran’s order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger