; an increase of 6.14 million shares or 975.28 percent.  The above acts were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in

notify his client of some transactions.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555

decision on behalf of client, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of Business Operators to Perform Duties of

trade securities in the client's account without permission in order to achieve better performance.      {A}'s actions are in violation of Clause 20(1) and 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

and his client showed that he had used the client's account to trade securities for himself.{A}'s actions were deemed the violation of Clauses 20(1) and (3) of the Notification of Capital Market

securities trade order instructions are the violation of Clause 20(2) and 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of Business Operators

are in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 re: Approval for Personnel of Business Operators to Perform Duties of Analyzing Investment

. (FOCUS) share price during April 24-25, 2008. His offense is in violation of Section 243 (1), Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 in conjunction with Section 86 of the

loss. Their actions were in violation of Section 241, subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). On June 18, 2014, Yongyuth and Vorapin agreed to enter

? trading values and volumes and lure the general public to trade such shares.The aforesaid actions were deemed manipulation of TYM share price in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243