Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23

Mr. Nattapong Akekapan Mr. Nattapong Akekapan conspired with other alleged persons to operate derivatives broker businesses in Thailand without proper licenses granted violating Section 16 of the

Mr. Pisanu Boonard Mr. Pisanu Boonard conspired with other alleged persons to operate derivatives broker businesses in Thailand without proper licenses granted violating Section 16 of the Derivatives

Miss Manassanun Piyapongpan Miss Manassanun Piyapongpan conspired with other alleged persons to operate derivatives broker businesses in Thailand without proper licenses granted violating Section 16

Miss Indhira Suebsang Miss Indhira Suebsang conspired with other alleged persons to operate derivatives broker businesses in Thailand without proper licenses granted violating Section 16 of the

Miss Supalak Raksasri Miss Supalak Raksasri conspired with other alleged persons to operate derivatives broker businesses in Thailand without proper licenses granted violating Section 16 of the

. Such activities were in violation of Section 244/3 (1) and (2), the presumption under Section 244/5 and Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with

subsidiaries. Both acts led to the three individuals gaining benefits at the total amount of 3,465.64 million baht. The acts of the three individuals above constituted offences under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2

contravention of Section 240 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), subject to the penalties under Paragraph 1 of Section 296 and Section 296/2 and the civil penalties under Section 317/4 and

statements for the second quarter of 2018 to SET on 14 August 2018. The action of Chantip contravened Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1) which were subject to civil sanctions under Section