securities without approval in the category of debenture in violation of Section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The SEC has therefore filed separate complaints against the four

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with details as summarized below:? M.L. Tossuwan, Premchai, Apinuntakan, Sarunya, and Kitja for ratifying GEN?s prior investment in P Plus P Plc. ' s shares and warrants

) June 23-24, 2008. Earlier on February 17, 2011, the Settlement Committee under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) had imposed fines in the amounts of 16,071,788.32 baht and 4,563,791.25 baht

the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed company, Chupong has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to

aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed

D Global, Seandar Inc., Huang Young Lin, Tang Tia Julien, and Teh Cheng Huat, it is a violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor

million in 2009, respectively.Their actions were in violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code

and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in December 2014, it was after the SEC's probe had revealed such

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000