Somchai, Chaninun, and Thanakorn were deemed as violation of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). All of them were allowed to enter the settlement procedure. As
? 23 July 2014 before the company disclosed the Q2 operating results via the SET. Assavin?s offence was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) and liable to the
failure to comply with the SEC?s order, the company and its responsible management are liable to violation of Section 58 (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) with penalties under Section
; an increase of 6.14 million shares or 975.28 percent. The above acts were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in
notify his client of some transactions.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555
decision on behalf of client, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of Business Operators to Perform Duties of
trade securities in the client's account without permission in order to achieve better performance. {A}'s actions are in violation of Clause 20(1) and 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
and his client showed that he had used the client's account to trade securities for himself.{A}'s actions were deemed the violation of Clauses 20(1) and (3) of the Notification of Capital Market