conditions.  The three persons? offences were in violation of Section 243(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 244, and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

approximately 5.11 million stocks to 7.43 million stocks.The offenses committed by Atthavut and Sujeera were deemed manipulation of TIGER price under Section 244/3 (1) and (2), subject to the penalties under

to 7.43 million stocks. The offenses committed by Atthavut and Sujeera were deemed manipulation of TIGER price under Section 244/3 (1) and (2), subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1

and the persons from (3) to (7) were in violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2), and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act

price margin, causing damage to a large number of investors.   The seven persons? offences were in violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) and liable to the

buying securities while knowing or possessing inside information as specified in Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 244(4), which carries penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2, as well as

244/3 (1)(2) in conjunction with Section 244/5 (4) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1, Section 296/2 and the civil

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

of Section 9, Paragraph 1 of Section 74 in conjunction with Section 28 and Paragraph 1 of Section 89 in conjunction with Section 28 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), which contains certain

that  he continued to submit trading orders in the same manner. The act of Surin constituted a violation of Section 244/3 and will be subject to punishment under Section 296, Section 296/1, and