which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under
trading orders and trading consultations. Thus, the actions of {B} and {C} were considered as trading securities on behalf of the client in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification No. TorLorThor. 3
cost and revenue. The information material to investment decision such as key risks and progress of projects was therefore deficient.Their actions were considered as failure to comply with the SEC Office
securities businesses of brokerage, investment advisory and private fund management by advertising, soliciting and using website http://www.qg-corp.com. The said actions were subject to an imprisonment from 2
. 37/2553 re: Prohibitions for Personnel of Business Operators dated September 15, 2010. The actions were in violation of Clauses 23(2) and the prohibited characteristics of the personnel in the capital
Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor/Nor/Khor. 37/2553 re: Prohibitions for Personnel of Business Operators dated September 15, 2010. The actions were in violation of Clauses 23(1) and (2) and the
Supervisory Board No. TorThor/Nor/Khor. 37/2553 re: Prohibitions for Personnel of Business Operators dated September 15, 2010. The actions were in violation of Clause 23(1) and the prohibited characteristics of
million in 2009, respectively.Their actions were in violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code