Bangkok, July 14, 2014 ? The SEC is seeking public comment on the draft regulations to be issued under Section 315/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) on payment of bounty and

violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The above persons, named in the criminal complaint filed by the SEC, are deemed as having untrustworthy

, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and

issued under Section 58 (1), which is liable to the offenses under Section 274 and Section 281/10 in conjunction with Section 58 (1) of the SEA, and the case where EARTH disclosed misleading statements

Service For three months until end of September 30 For three months until end of September 30 Increase / (Decrease) Percentage Sea Freight 149.20 160.60 -11.40 -7.10 Air Freight 246.64 124.16 122.48 98.65

, in conjunction with Section 89/7, Section 89/24, Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), and in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Criminal

contravention of Section 240 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), subject to the penalties under Paragraph 1 of Section 296 and Section 296/2 and the civil penalties under Section 317/4 and

296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2559 (2016), as amended, (SEA). As aider and abettor, Amornrat and Walailuk violated Section 315 in conjunction with Section 242(1) which

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor