several foreign residents to use services and advice of PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services
advice of PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse
make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range
to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
long-term returns. Thus, EMM operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions
provided for EMM which committed an offence under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289 by operating securities business without obtaining
for EMM which committed an offence under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289 by operating securities business without obtaining license
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The inquiry official forwarded the requested for the settlement. The Settlement Committee determined the fine, order no. 93/2017 dated on 15 November2017 and Marnfah Group