Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. This case is in the process of inquiry by the prosecutor official. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 02/03/2016
licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. This case is in the process
several foreign residents to use services and advice of PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services
advice of PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse
make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range
to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
long-term returns. Thus, EMM operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions
provided for EMM which committed an offence under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289 by operating securities business without obtaining