, designing mutual funds according to the investment policy, assets to be invested, payment period, investors’ expectation regarding unit selling, risk monitoring throughout the scheme term, obtaining diverse

, (2) insufficient evidence on the reasonableness of the management's decision to approve the deposit payment for the investment in the Native based Scene Advertising Digital Solution, and (3) the

misappropriated the client's subscription cash payment of 500,000 baht for his own use. He then ordered his subordinate to transfer units of another mutual fund held by the same client into the solicited fund by

, was not significantly different from its book value. In fact, B671 million of the land?s appraisal value plus the land filling payment was materially lower than its book value recorded at B946 million

including appraisal of impairment of assets, transactions occurred after the date of the financial statements, limitation of internal control of receipt and payment transactions, trade receivables, other

. Dome Fund to pay 10.4 million baht to Bania. It was claimed that the payment was made for the turnkey contract of construction and improvements of certain areas in T.U. Dome Fund assets, which was

the settlement procedure (SEC News No. 87/2014), but later failed to make fine payment in full as specified by the Settlement Committee.  The criminal case has thus not been regarded as settled.In this

illustrating making trading decision before client acknowledgement. The client then acknowledged the transactions without any objection and made payment completely.  {A}'s actions were deemed using client

her client regularly as well as reported to her client on the summary of profit and loss on a monthly basis. On March 12, 2012, {A} made trading decisions without the client's instruction and payment

a breach of contract as an amount of Baht 94,474.27 and interest until the payment is fully made. Subsequently, on 5 September, 2018, Mr. Noppadol sold 2,000,000 TRUE shares by using such inside