and the persons from (3) to (7) were in violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2), and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act

the juristic person or its shareholders of their rightful benefit, which, according to Section 312(2), shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of 5 years and a fine of B500,000 (2) dishonestly

and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be.  The said actions also caused damages to the company but

digital asset investments, liable to be an offense under Section 40 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018).The case of Zipmex director and CEO Akalarp Yimwilai was an offense

such action. Athit’s acts are liable to operating securities business without license in contravention of Section 90, which is subject to the penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange

investment, listed companies must also consider the transaction size and the obligation to comply with the governing regulations. If such transaction is liable to be material, the companies shall be subject to

solicitation attracted investments from the public at a total amount of 10 million baht.Such misconduct of Marnfah Group and Lederer (Thailand) above was liable to public offering of securities in the category

conditions.  The three persons? offences were in violation of Section 243(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 244, and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

-public facts that influenced the securities price. His act was liable to the offences under Section 241 and the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA

was a securities purchase that took advantage of a material, non-public fact that influenced the securities price, which was deemed an exploitation of third parties and liable to the offences under