, 2014, the Criminal Court ruled against Ratchasak, Phongsak, and Siriporn for violating Sections 306 and 312 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 and 343 of the Penal Code. They were sentenced to 8
Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
judgement, and another five cases have received verdicts from the Court of First Instance and are currently under appeal. In all 10 cases above, the Court ruled in favor of the SEC, imposing the maximum civil
sanctions imposed by the Civil Sanction Committee. However, if any offender declines to comply with the civil sanctions ruled by the Civil Sanction Committee, SEC will seek an assistance from Public
civil sanction. However, if any offender declines to comply with the civil sanctions ruled by the Civil Sanction Committee, SEC will seek an assistance from Public Attorney to file a civil lawsuit with
lawsuit against them with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against both defendants as principals on two counts in accordance with Section 42 Chor (1), (2) of the
forgery in contravention of Sections 307, 308, 311 and 315 of SEA and Sections 264 and 268 of the Penal Code. The Criminal Court, on October 28, 2014, ruled that Shisiro, Pisan and Kanchanok (or
Department of Economic Crime Litigation 4 of the Office of the Attorney- General. This resulted in a lawsuit filed against the defendant.On March 30, 2015, the Criminal Court ruled against Ratchasak for
FOCUS share price. Her jail term, however, was suspended for two years.Yesterday (October 31, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against two share price manipulators for violating Section 243(1), (2) in