, the Legal Department sent out a letter of payment request to MAT and the representative of MAT contacted for negotiation but there was no any conclusion. On January 25, 2017, the Legal Department sent
legal actions. On October 17, 2016, the Legal Department sent out a letter of payment request to MAT, and then the representative of MAT contacted for negotiation but there was no any conclusion. On
contacted to sell the program rights to a customer who operates a digital television station who had given attention and was considering to buy the program rights from the Company. Then, they introduced a
Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the handling of customer’s complaint, as the case may be, and it appears the fact that; 1. the claimant is not contacted by the complaint
notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the handling of customer’s complaint, as the case may be, and it appears the fact that; 1. the claimant is not contacted by the
notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the handling of customer’s complaint, as the case may be, and it appears the fact that; 1. the claimant is not contacted by the
conditions of the assets at the time of tender. In addition, the Company had always been trying to sell such Land and Buildings but no interested persons contacted. Until the present, the Company received a
assets at the time of tender. In addition, the Company had always been trying to sell such Land and Buildings but no interested persons contacted. Until the present, the Company received a letter
find investor who is interested in investing in the project. The buyer contacted the shares in Akkrawat through the major shareholder of Akkrawat that the buyer has wished to buy all shares of Akarawat
company would like to update the progress of debt restructuring as followings; From early of 2016, the Company was contacted by Asia Credit Opportunities I (Mauritius) Limited (“ACO I”), the juristic person