} assured his colleague that it was the client’s decision. Therefore, the transaction had been executed. However, when the authorization documents were brought to the client for signature, the client

the client securities trading account as collateral. In this case, {A} had continuously done day trading of client securities for 25 working days worth approximately 109 million baht, resulting in her

applicant. In case the application is submitted by an authorized person and the evidentiary documentation is incorrect or incomplete, the authorized person must show a written authorization from the applicant

& Verify(A) SignFile & Verify(B) Authorization details (EF-3) : companyName systemName reportName effectiveDate

manager that she had obtained such authorization and decided to trade by the instruction of clients? appointee or by her own deliberation. For a long period of time, she continually made trading decisions

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), through its Transparency Working Group, held a meeting to discuss measures for promoting organizational integrity and transparency in 2025. Mrs

Company Registration Number Officer Name Officer Email Current Datetime Client Datetime SecSign File Version SignMessage & Verify SignFile & Verify(A) SignFile & Verify(B) Authorization details (EF-3

case the application is submitted by an authorized person and the evidentiary documentation is incorrect or incomplete, the authorized person must show a written authorization from the applicant to sign

, starting from December 22, 2015.  On other cases, {B} was found accepting orders to trade securities in a client's account from a person who was not the owner of the account without any written authorization

from a person who was not the owner of the account without any written authorization, and causing a misunderstanding that there had been a conversation with, and acceptance of trading orders from, the