) Isan Palm Industry Development Co., Ltd., (4) Unity Palm Oil Co., Ltd., (5) Mr. Borom Engchuan, (6) GI Green Palm Oil CO., LTD., (7) Mrs. Tanipa Puangjumpa, (8) OPG Tech CO., LTD., and (9) Mr. Zait
the company and its subsidiaries? failures to appraise the fair value of fixed assets in order to determine their realization value as well as the auditor?s dissatisfaction by means of other audit
extended deadline because the new financial advisor whom PACE has appointed to appraise the fair value measurement of the investment is still gathering and analyzing data and information from many sources to
the extended deadline because the new financial advisor whom PACE has appointed to appraise the fair value measurement of the investment is still gathering and analyzing data and information from many
the extended deadline because the new financial advisor whom PACE has appointed to appraise the fair value measurement of the investment is still gathering and analyzing data and information from many
. (currently named Thai Bio Innovation Co., Ltd.), (4) Mr.Pollapat Srivisanwong, (5) Isan Palm Industry Development Co., Ltd., (6) Unity Palm Oil Co., Ltd., (7) Mr. Borom Engchuan, (8) GI Green Palm Oil CO
he obliged under any binding document to sell such assets to repay his debts. Moreover, it appears that NIPPON did not check the existence of such assets or appraise the value in consideration of the
, causing IFA unable to appraise the project value; (4) various risks associated with the acquisition of APU shares such as risk of fines payment to Myanmar government due to delay started of the project from
and the PPA remain unclear and uncertain while additional investment of 7,850 million baht is needed, causing IFA unable to appraise the project value; (3) various risks associated with the transaction
and the PPA remain unclear and uncertain while additional investment of 7,850 million baht is needed, causing IFA unable to appraise the project value; (3) various risks associated with the transaction