, resulting in the delay in delivery and acceptance of equipment or projects. As the result, the total revenue Q2–2020 was lower than those in other quarters. In terms of total operating expenses in Q3–2020, it
, the revenue recognition in Q2–2020 decreased. In terms of total operating expenses in Q2–2020, it decreased in line with the decreased in revenue at a very similar rate when compare to Q1–2020 and Q2
result, the revenue of Q2–2020 was lower. In terms of total operating expenses in Q2–2021 increased in line with the increased in revenue at a similar rate comparing to Q2–2021 and Q2–2020. This is because
allocated budgets for various ICT projects. As the result, the revenue in the Q4-2017 increased form the Q4-2016 In terms of total operating expenses in the Q4-2017, the change is proportional to the decrease
allocated budgets for various ICT projects. As the result, the revenue in the Q4-2017 increased form the Q4-2016 In terms of total operating expenses in the Q4-2017, the change is proportional to the decrease
, such as the Project of Ministry of higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. Therefore, the total revenue significantly increased from Q3–2018. In terms of total operating expenses increased in
- In terms of total operating expenses increased in line with the Company’s revenue. Comparing the total revenue and the total operating expenses in Q4–2019 with Q3–2019 and Q4-2018 showed that the
)% * Attributable to owners of the Bank In terms of operating results for the second quarter of 2018, compared with the first quarter of 2018, Bangkok Bank and its subsidiaries reported a net profit attributable to
8,377 6.0% 8.6% Net profit * 9,005 8,496 8,305 6.0% 8.4% Total comprehensive income * 3,738 8,705 6,895 (57.1)% (45.8)% * Attributable to owners of the Bank In terms of operating results for the first
restructuring and cost management as well as reserve requirements to comply with LCR guidelines under Basel III. In terms of loan quality, the ratio of gross non-performing loan (NPL) to total loans stood at 2.9