statements due to auditor?s limitation scope of review by VTE management. As such, the auditor was unable to apply other review procedures to satisfy the carrying value of investment in foreign associate
limitation on examination by the company?s executives regarding the company?s misuse of proceeds received from increase of capital by investing in common shares and warrants of P Plus P Plc. The proceeds used
. Earlier, the SEC notified SINGHA to rectify its 2010 financial statements (submitted to the SEC on February 27, 2012) due to limitation of audit scope by the company?s management causing the auditor to
statements, earlier extended to May 31, 2012. Previously, the SEC ordered PRO to rectify its 2011 financial statements due to the limitation of audit scope by the company?s management on the matters concerning
September 30, 2014.Earlier, the SEC notified STHAI to rectify its 2012 financial statements due to the limitation on scope of audit imposed by the company management in various matters including quantities
whole or in part, to manage the business of the securities company only with the approval from the Office. In cases where it later appears that the persons under the first paragraph have the prohibited
decisions of investors. The board of directors responsible for company management must expedite the process to ensure the best interests of the company and its shareholders as a whole. The SEC has therefore
an offense by making ADAM dishonestly purchased the whole ordinary shares of Kitha Properties Company Limited (“Kitha”) in 2014 resulting in Kitha becoming a subsidiary of ADAM with an incentive to
making ADAM dishonestly purchased the whole ordinary shares of Kitha in 2014 resulting in Kitha becoming a subsidiary of ADAM with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was