derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of  an imprisonment up to

statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of

project and the commitment made with the unitholders concerning the Rules on maintaining portfolio duration. SEC Act S.117 and 125(1) in conjunction with Section 90 of the Penal Code Settlement Committee

violated Section 98(8) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 5) B.E. 2559. SEC Act S.283 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 5/2024 Settlement Committee

to order or act resulting in Beyond’s failure to put in place sufficient and effective risk management system which violated Section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 amended by the

(before the fifth amendment) Section 241 Civil Action Dated 01/04/2020

; - a reimbursement of investigative expenses in an amount of 230,682.00 Baht SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section 242 (1) Civil Action Dated 19/11/2024

to believe that Mr. Suphan Sethapanich has obtained benefits from selling the bills of exchange (B/E). He, therefore, committed an offense under the second paragraph of Section 281/2 and Section 311 of

), misappropriated PPPC's money to invest in and pay off debts of the companies over which he had full control for his own benefit, causing damage to PPPC's property, violating Section 307, 308 & 311

in the Stock Exchange of Thailand under the name of "Bill Trade" without proper licenses granted, violating Section 90. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to a fine of