the closing price of the previous day, which misled other persons about the trading price and/or volume of MORE shares. As the acts are considered contravention of Section 244/3(1) in conjunction with

execution of the scheme.Their actions were in violation of Sections 243 (1), (2) in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code

securities without approval in the category of debenture in violation of Section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The SEC has therefore filed separate complaints against the four

considered in contravention of the second paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307 and 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with Sections 83 and 86 of the

, respectively, to lure the investing public into their businesses.The aforesaid acts are deemed undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546

of Directors pursuant to Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).KC must submit the amended financial statements, the Forms, and the results of the special audit to the SEC by

Section 83 of the Penal Code. Both persons, however, failed to pay the fines. The SEC therefore filed the criminal complaint against them with the DSI for further criminal proceedings. Also named in the

to have sufficient period of time to study relevant information prior to the meeting date. To comply with such good practice, under Section 89/28 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As they declined to enter the settlement

lawsuit against them with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against both defendants as principals on two counts in accordance with Section 42 Chor (1), (2) of the