___________________________________ By virtue of Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No.4) B.E. 2551 (2008) and Section 126(5) of the Securities and Exchange

committed upon the dishonest misappropriation of the fund for personal gains.   The actions committed by Mr. Chiyachantana and Ms. Hongsri were liable to be the offenses under Section 308, Section 311

such action. Athit’s acts are liable to operating securities business without license in contravention of Section 90, which is subject to the penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange

of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn

’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the

Bangkok, September 11, 2014 ?The SEC is seeking public comment on draft regulations on termination of listed company?s duty to disclose information under  Section 56 and duty of directors and

offence under Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/10 and Section 89/11, and liable to the penalties under the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. The

derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of  an imprisonment up to

statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of

(before the fifth amendment) Section 241 Civil Action Dated 01/04/2020