, 2019) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed and the statute of

(Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute of

2020 (Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute of

year 2020 (Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute

digital asset dealer without a license during the mentioned period. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. DAB Act S.26 and Section 83 of Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an

was the person who presents the financial statement to Board of directors and approve the false financial statement. The public prosecutor issued a final non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final

and civil and administrative cases on behalf of the government or state agency when a public prosecutor accepts to take charge of such execution. With a database of debtors under the judgments and

and submit the findings and views to public prosecutor who has authority to prosecute the case against the offenders. The consideration of whether person is guilty or not is thereafter vested on the

, had traded KARAT shares by using inside information before it was publicly disclosed on July 3, 2002. DSI later referred the case to public prosecutor who issued a prosecution order against Apichart

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code. The public prosecutor subsequently filed the case with the Criminal Court against {A