sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead the public and investors about
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead
with others in which STARK disclosed information through the SET Electronic Listed Companies Information Disclosure (ELCID) regarding the change in the use of proceeds from its capital fundraising by
. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could
raising activities both in equity and debt securities including the details of the fund mobilizers by industry, companies and individual instruments.SEC has been continuously developing the open data
Guidelines for Establishment of Information Technology Systems
that investors can have information for decision-making. At the same time, STARK was also instructed to extend the scope of its special audit to cover a number of material issues and clarify related
by financial advisor Bualuang Securities Public Company Limited, lacked sufficient details of the ultimate tender offeror and contained no information on the identity of the shareholders or the person
investors? decision making. The SEC therefore instructed CHEWA and RHB to clarify the information given in the interview and include it along with sufficient details in the IPO filing for the benefit of