approximately Baht 346,566,732.341) (“Transaction” ) . The size of the Transaction calculated based on the total value of consideration paid criteria, which gives the highest value, is equivalent to 0.87 per cent
acquisition or disposal of assets B.E.2547. When calculating the size of transaction based on the total value of consideration, the total value of consideration is approximately Baht 393.17 million (calculated
segment of IVL was adversely impacted due to steeply lower crude oil price impacting margins of MTBE & Int. EG as shale gas lost its advantage against naphtha based producers. • Mobility & Lifestyle Fibers
of Finance (11,730.46) (53,453.22) (50,852.08) (48,604.38) Income (Expense) Tax Revenue (95.68) (126.16) 9.88 9.04 Net Profit 50,264.12 247,243.17 253,313.55 196,669.93 Based on the above financial
which may affect the margin rate, including types, characteristics and ratio of the margin by at least including the following details: (1) daily calculation of the risk value based on price volatility
terminal growth rate and discounted rate used in the assumptions are based on management of the subsidiary’s judgment and past experience and business plan, as well as the future prediction that is believed
management. Based on the Company's financial statements for the 3 months ended March 31, 2018 The Company had a net loss of 4.22 million Baht or 1.57 percent of revenues from services. The net loss of the
Baht from the same period last year which is estimated from unpaid debtor. Such estimation are based on the Company’s regulations related accounting policy. 4. Financial expense amount of 42.47 million
received amount as the Company’s working capital. 7. Criteria to Determine the Value of Consideration: The Total Value of Consideration was calculated based on SBITO’s Book Value as of March 31, 2017 which
assumptions are based on management of the subsidiary’s judgment and past experience and business plan, as well as the future prediction that is believed to be reasonable in the present situation and compared