. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under

authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation

, failed to order or act his duty resulting in SKFM violation of section 133 paragraph 1 and 2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SKFM failed to comply with the rules, conditions, and procedures

Bitazza. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Bitazza concerning the case that between August 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 Bitazza failed to keep

of Satang. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Satang concerning the case that between August 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 Satang failed to keep

to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that during September 15, 2021 to May 7, 2022, Zipmex kept and maintained digital assets of

or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that during the middle of 2020 to September 7, 2022, Zipmex Company Limited ("Zipmex"), a digital

to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that since January 1, 2022, Zipmex has not been providing policies, measures, and guidance for

to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that Zipmex has duties to submit the report of penetration test result to the SEC office within

to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that during April 7, 2022 to July20, 2022, Zipmex did not fully disclosed necessary information