of Directors pursuant to Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).KC must submit the amended financial statements, the Forms, and the results of the special audit to the SEC by
Section 83 of the Penal Code. Both persons, however, failed to pay the fines. The SEC therefore filed the criminal complaint against them with the DSI for further criminal proceedings. Also named in the
to have sufficient period of time to study relevant information prior to the meeting date. To comply with such good practice, under Section 89/28 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As they declined to enter the settlement
lawsuit against them with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against both defendants as principals on two counts in accordance with Section 42 Chor (1), (2) of the
case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were
unlawful gains for the benefit of herself and others, in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Phra Suthep Arpassaro (Panpai) and Vachala Pisitsak were also
) for falsifying the company?s documents and accounts in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The SEC?s finding indicated that Somchit proceeded or permitted
. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 89/7 89/24 311 and 313 in conjunction with section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 02/08/2021