and civil and administrative cases on behalf of the government or state agency when a public prosecutor accepts to take charge of such execution. With a database of debtors under the judgments and

and submit the findings and views to public prosecutor who has authority to prosecute the case against the offenders. The consideration of whether person is guilty or not is thereafter vested on the

, had traded KARAT shares by using inside information before it was publicly disclosed on July 3, 2002. DSI later referred the case to public prosecutor who issued a prosecution order against Apichart

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code. The public prosecutor subsequently filed the case with the Criminal Court against {A

of the SEA. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.311 and Section 89/7 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17/11/2016

effective. Mr. Boonpiam involved in voting for ADAM to buy Kitha’s shares and signing the share purchase agreement. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction

effective. Mr. Chinnavat involved in voting for ADAM to buy Kitha’s shares and signing the share purchase agreement. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction

shares and voting as proxy for shareholders in the agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal

and proposing special agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry

, Ms. Bongkorn involved in using other securities trading accounts to buy shares of ADAM for controlling vote in shareholder meeting. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order.. SEC Act S