into the case and found that from July 24 to August 26, 2009, {A} {B} {C} {D} {E} {F} {G} {H} {I} {J} and {K} had colluded to trade MILL shares through securities trading accounts of their own and other

been set up and offered investment units to the public.?State enterprises can mobilize fund by setting up infrastructure funds in a pattern  suitable for their own organizations; for instance, selling

found that on October 3, 2012, {A} {B} and {C} had colluded to trade TPC shares through their own securities trading accounts and the accounts of {D} and {E}. The trading was done in the manner that

allowed to invest in derivatives only for hedging. Furthermore, for provident funds with a ?do it yourself? (DIY) policy that allow the fund members to determine their own investment proportion in

manager that she had obtained such authorization and decided to trade by the instruction of clients? appointee or by her own deliberation. For a long period of time, she continually made trading decisions

Worathan Uahvilaijit for assisting them with such wrongdoing, at the total amount of 6,704,138.33 baht. According to a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the SEC?s own investigation

rights to protect their own benefits, and seek clarification or explanation from the board of directors and executives so as to have sufficient information for their decision-making. The above transaction

}, the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A} persuaded his client to invest in derivatives contracts by exaggerating return from investment. He had prepared his own documents for giving

shareholders to study the information thoroughly and exercise their rights to protect their own benefits. In addition, they should seek further clarifications from the company?s executives for insightful

judgement and ordering each party to pay there own costs and expenses.25/02/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement ordering the defendant to pay a civil penalty and a compensation at an equal