the ZipUp+ program, while the SEC was collecting and examining facts related to the business operation of Zipmex.   Following the collection and examination of the facts aforementioned, the Competent

}. However, after fact examination, it was found that there was a reasonable ground to believe that the actual payment for the purchase of the land and the office building was 40 million baht, and the

working for Asia Plus Securities Co., Ltd. at the time of misconduct.Following the inspection report submitted by Asia Plus Securities and the subsequent examination conducted by the SEC, it was found that

trading decisions for the client. From examination of communications records, there was no sources of the orders; just transaction confirmations made by such investment consultant and the conversations

for such trading was made from the client account by {A} without the knowledge of the client.The {B} case was also lodged by an investor. The SEC's finding from an examination of conversation records

; assets to SEC with information that did not align with the facts found by the SEC's examination. This resulted in the consideration that Mr. Akalarp committed or permitted Zipmex Thailand to make

net asset value of the mutual fund, the information about investments made by such foreign fund, as far as the information is made available to the public by the foreign fund or as far as the

Far East Ltd, increase of registered capital, allotment of newly issued ordinary shares via Private Placement and schedule for EGM No.1/2025 16/06/2023 08:22 The Asset Acquisition by Acquiring shares of

different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the

handle suitable portfolios for investors through different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated