PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the

containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the

business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court

result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The

result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

collateral. Furthermore, BAY failed to monitor and oversee the collateral while it was under its care. Such actions constitute a violation of Section 300 in conjunction with Section 46, which is subject to

penalty under Section 300 in conjunction with Section 278 and Section 302/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (the “Securities and Exchange Act”). This case is in the process of inquiry by the

as the connected transaction of the Company, pursuant to the Section 89/12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act and the announcement of the Capital Market Supervisory Board Tor.Jor. 21/2551 Re

Digital Asset Business Registered Person Secondary Market and Related Entities Enforcement Class Action Prevention of Unfair Securities Trading Practices Discussion Rule Making Process Handbooks / Best