violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As they declined to enter the settlement
lawsuit against them with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against both defendants as principals on two counts in accordance with Section 42 Chor (1), (2) of the
lawsuit against them with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against both defendants as principals on two counts in accordance with Section 42 Chor (1), (2) of the
case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were
unlawful gains for the benefit of herself and others, in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Phra Suthep Arpassaro (Panpai) and Vachala Pisitsak were also
) for falsifying the company?s documents and accounts in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The SEC?s finding indicated that Somchit proceeded or permitted
civil court20/02/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the process of legal execution SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section 281
NINE; and - 03/09/2021 Filing a lawsuit accusing him and other 10 persons jointly manipulating the share price of NBC. SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 (1) in conjunction with 244 (1
- 28/09/2021 Filing a lawsuit accusing him and other 4 persons jointly manipulating the warrant price of NINE-W1. SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 (1) in conjunction with 244 (1) (2
- 28/09/2021 Filing a lawsuit accusing him and other 4 persons jointly manipulating the warrant price of NINE-W1. SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 (1) in conjunction with 244 (1) (2